Comments on: You don’t have to sell out to have financial security http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security Sat, 05 May 2012 21:49:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19827 By: john http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/#comment-636 john Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:47:04 +0000 http:/xentek.net/?p=143#comment-636 thats really awesome post really. thats really awesome post really.

]]> By: Eric Marden http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/#comment-635 Eric Marden Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:47:48 +0000 http:/xentek.net/?p=143#comment-635 I stand corrected. Booya~! I stand corrected. Booya~!

]]> By: Joseph http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/#comment-634 Joseph Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:32:47 +0000 http:/xentek.net/?p=143#comment-634 From da PG essay: <i>You can choose whichever revenue strategy you think is best for the type of company you're starting, so long as you're profitable. </i> From da PG essay:

You can choose whichever revenue strategy you think is best for the type of company you’re starting, so long as you’re profitable.

]]> By: Eric Marden http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/#comment-633 Eric Marden Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:24:57 +0000 http:/xentek.net/?p=143#comment-633 That's a really good point. However, I personally favor DHH's approach to business, as this is exactly how I see my own endeavors playing out. Though, I wouldn't necessarily say that PG is endorsing profitable business per se. Companies built to flip are fine, but they aren't the kind of company I would want to create or work for. That’s a really good point. However, I personally favor DHH’s approach to business, as this is exactly how I see my own endeavors playing out. Though, I wouldn’t necessarily say that PG is endorsing profitable business per se. Companies built to flip are fine, but they aren’t the kind of company I would want to create or work for.

]]> By: Joseph http://xentek.net/articles/143/you-dont-have-to-sell-out-to-have-financial-security/#comment-632 Joseph Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:16:36 +0000 http:/xentek.net/?p=143#comment-632 Paul Graham and the venerable asshole DHH are basically espousing the same thing: creating a profitable business. If you like operating the business, keep doing it and outsource the boring stuff if you wanna. If you want to and can cash out and move on to something else, that's a great achievement as well. Both these guys have been wildly successful in their own ways, so I don't see it as an either/or scenerio really. Personally I'd rather be Paul Graham; he's much more rich and a better writer to boot. Paul Graham and the venerable asshole DHH are basically espousing the same thing: creating a profitable business. If you like operating the business, keep doing it and outsource the boring stuff if you wanna. If you want to and can cash out and move on to something else, that’s a great achievement as well. Both these guys have been wildly successful in their own ways, so I don’t see it as an either/or scenerio really.

Personally I’d rather be Paul Graham; he’s much more rich and a better writer to boot.

]]>